Skip to content
SediLogic Technologies

Industrial pre-treatment

Crude refinery, Central America

Oily sludge holding extractable petroleum hydrocarbons at a concentration that made disposal the only route available.

68%

reduction in extractable petroleum hydrocarbons

Field resultConfounded
Duty
Industrial pre-treatment
Sector
Industrial
Treatment window
90 days
What was counted
Hydrocarbons
  • 29,195 ppm to 9,395 ppm over 90 days
Aboveground steel storage tanks at an industrial facility.
Illustration — aboveground tanks at an industrial site, not the plant described on this page.

01The plant

What was being treated

Two land-treatment cells of one to two acres, built beside the waste reservoirs of a crude oil refinery in Central America.

02Before

How the material got there

7,300 cubic yards of oily sludge had collected in the reservoirs over eight years, at an extractable petroleum hydrocarbon concentration of 79,000 mg/kg and made up mostly of C₁₄ to C₄₀ chains. Landfill and incineration were the alternatives being priced. A US engineering firm led the project, and the target was to get the average below 10,000 ppm as quickly as it could be done.

03Treatment

What was applied, and how

The sludge was dredged out, mixed with soil, lime and Portland cement to bulk and stabilise it, spread across the cells, graded, tilled and fertilised with nitrogen and phosphorus. A dry hydrocarbon-degrading blend went on after that, was rehydrated immediately and tilled in. From there the cells were tilled at least weekly to keep them mixed and aerated.

Every result in this library was measured at an operating plant treating with one of the formulations SediLogic supplies, over the window stated above. It is a field result published as reported, not a controlled trial we ran.

04Sizing

What the quantity was set against

Against the mass of material spread across the cells. A land-treatment cell is dosed by what it holds, not by a flow or by a volume of water, and everything about the basis here belongs to soil treatment rather than to a lagoon.

05Method

How the result was established

Twenty samples taken across the cells at ninety days, against a baseline drawn from the blended sludge-and-soil mixture at the point the blend was applied.

06Outcome

What followed

Those three areas were tilled hard to get oxygen into them, and the project closed.

At the start

Baseline of the blended mixture averaging 29,195 ppm extractable petroleum hydrocarbons.

At the close

9,395 ppm at ninety days. Three of the twenty samples were still above the 10,000-ppm limit, all of them from spots that had stood water-saturated for much of the period.

07Limits

What this record does not establish.

Read the two starting numbers together. The sludge itself held 79,000 mg/kg; the baseline that sixty-eight per cent is measured against is 29,195 ppm, after the sludge had been mixed with soil, lime and cement. Dilution accounts for some part of the gap and the record does not say how much. Nor can the blend be separated from the rest of the work: the cells were fertilised, graded and tilled weekly for ninety days, and tilling oily soil degrades hydrocarbons on its own. Nothing was left untreated. This is soil bioremediation, which SediLogic does not supply.

Only the volatile organic fraction of a sludge responds to any of this. Grit, sand, silt, mineral precipitates and plastics remain at any dose, here and everywhere else.

What we would supply

For this duty, in our range.

SediLogic Liquid is the article in the range that reaches this — a concentrate for systems a solid cannot be dosed into, which covers most of what sits upstream of an industrial outfall. Where the target is instead an accumulated blanket in a holding basin, the sinking solids are the right format and the lagoon products apply.

SediLogic holds a written dose table for wastewater lagoons and for no other duty. Industrial loads are also the least alike of anything on this site — a rate set for one plant's effluent means very little at the next — so a quantity here is settled with a person, against your own stream.

Read next

The same duty, measured somewhere else.

  • Industrial pre-treatment

    Petrochemical effluent plant

    Industrial1 year

    $120,000

    reported annual saving on carbon dosing

    Field resultNo method stated

    Organic load being carried by powdered activated carbon, at a cost that rose with every increase in the feed.

    • Oil degradation reported as improved over the same period
    HydrocarbonsBOD and COD
  • Industrial pre-treatment

    Municipal oil and water separator, Boston

    MunicipalNot published

    99.7%

    reduction in total petroleum hydrocarbons

    Field result

    Total petroleum hydrocarbons in a separator at more than two hundred times the discharge limit, with pumping the only route to compliance.

    • 22,940 mg/L to 79 mg/L, against a 100 mg/L limit
    • Annual pumping cost reported down to $1,200
    Hydrocarbons
  • Industrial pre-treatment

    Coking plant effluent treatment

    IndustrialWeeks

    29 to 86%

    ammonia removal

    Field resultConfounded

    A nitrifying population that would not establish itself, leaving ammonia removal at less than a third of what the permit assumed.

    • COD removal reported as improved over the same period

    Nitrifying organisms do not survive drying. No product in SediLogic's dry range addresses an ammonia or total-nitrogen permit, and this record is published as part of the field record rather than as an offer.

    Nitrogen and ammoniaBOD and COD

All field results

Your lagoon next

This was measured somewhere else.

A different plant, a different loading and a different sludge. What decides your result is how much of your own accumulation is organic and treatable, and whether the dose is sized against the lagoon in front of us rather than read off this page. Tell us the dimensions and we will size it.