Skip to content
SediLogic Technologies

Wastewater lagoons

Municipal lagoon, 11 ft deep

Sludge occupying eight to ten feet of an eleven-foot lagoon, leaving nine per cent of the design capacity available for treatment, against a $600,000 dredging quotation.

28%

reduction in sludge depth in the treated area

Field resultUntreated control
Duty
Wastewater lagoons
Sector
Municipal
Treatment window
60 days
What was counted
Sludge depth and solids, Capacity and retention time
  • 0.87 m (2.8 ft) less sludge over 60 days
  • Treatment capacity 9 per cent to 35 per cent
  • An untreated area of the same lagoon gained 0.47 m (1.5 ft) over the same period
Aerial view of a multi-cell aerated wastewater lagoon, its surface broken by aeration, with grass berms dividing the cells and a small control building alongside.
Illustration — an operating aerated lagoon, not the works described on this page.

01The plant

What was being treated

A 2.5 hectare (6 acre) municipal lagoon, 3.4 m (11 ft) deep, aerated by two floating mixers at the front end.

02Before

How the material got there

Years of accumulation had left 2.4 to 3.0 m (8 to 10 ft) of material through the lagoon, leaving very little working depth. A dredging quotation stood at $600,000.

03Treatment

What was applied, and how

A dense sinking solid applied to an area of the lagoon carrying significant accumulation, over six months.

Every result in this library was measured at an operating plant treating with one of the formulations SediLogic supplies, over the window stated above. It is a field result published as reported, not a controlled trial we ran.

04Sizing

What the quantity was set against

Applied to a defined treated area rather than across the whole lagoon, which is what made the comparison below possible.

05Method

How the result was established

Accumulation measured monthly for six months in the treated area and in an untreated area of the same lagoon, and compared.

06Comparison

What was left untreated

An untreated control area was held in the same lagoon and measured on the same schedule. Same water, same weather, same loading — which removes the seasonal question that hangs over most records here, and is why a 28 per cent result is worth more than several larger ones.

07Outcome

What followed

The dredging project was postponed with no reported effect on effluent quality.

At the start

8 to 10 ft of accumulation, treatment capacity down to about 9 per cent in the treated area.

At the close

28 per cent less accumulation in the treated area, and capacity there up from 9 to 35 per cent.

08Limits

What this record does not establish.

The control area is described but its own readings are not published, so the comparison has to be taken on trust. Neither area's volatile fraction is given. Postponed is not avoided — the inert fraction is still there.

Only the volatile organic fraction of a sludge responds to any of this. Grit, sand, silt, mineral precipitates and plastics remain at any dose, here and everywhere else.

What we would supply

For this duty, in our range.

This is the duty SediLogic supplies and sizes. Which article depends on where the material sits: Sedivore Spike is the denser solid and carries down through depth to an established blanket, Sedivore Puck is a smaller unit that spreads a calculated dose across the bed, and SediLogic Maintain is a soluble pouch for load carried in the water column — with Sedivore Polar for that same duty where the water runs cold enough to stall a standard blend.

A quantity for your own lagoon comes from the dosing planner, sized against your dimensions and loading from the manufacturer's written dose method. It does not come from the figure on this page, which was set for a lagoon that is not yours.

Read next

The same duty, measured somewhere else.

  • Wastewater lagoons

    Barbourville, Kentucky

    Municipal24 weeks

    43.3%

    of accumulated solids digested

    Field result

    Just over five feet of accumulated solids in the primary aerated lagoon, assessed at 2,365 dry tons. The plant wanted a route that did not involve dredging.

    • 1,025 dry tons removed
    • Average depth 5.08 ft to 2.65 ft
    Sludge depth and solids
  • Wastewater lagoons

    Inkom, Idaho

    MunicipalFive months, May to October

    48%

    reduction in solids volume overall

    Field result

    Accumulated solids across two lagoon cells, against a specification calling for a 50 per cent reduction. The treatment window was bounded by water temperature, which has to stay above roughly 55°F for the organisms to work at all.

    • Cell 1: 75.2 per cent
    • Cell 2: 37.5 per cent
    Sludge depth and solids
  • Wastewater lagoons

    Municipal WWTP, United States

    Municipal3 months

    672,659lb

    of organic solids digested

    Field result

    Decades of loading had taken the lagoon to a measured 20.5 per cent solids, with a dredging quotation in hand and no budget line to meet it.

    • Dredging deferred, not ruled out
    • A 4.5x cost saving against the dredging quotation
    Sludge depth and solids

All field results

Your lagoon next

This was measured somewhere else.

A different plant, a different loading and a different sludge. What decides your result is how much of your own accumulation is organic and treatable, and whether the dose is sized against the lagoon in front of us rather than read off this page. Tell us the dimensions and we will size it.