Skip to content
SediLogic Technologies

Industrial pre-treatment

Petrochemical effluent plant

Organic load being carried by powdered activated carbon, at a cost that rose with every increase in the feed.

$120,000

reported annual saving on carbon dosing

Field resultNo method stated
Duty
Industrial pre-treatment
Sector
Industrial
Treatment window
1 year
What was counted
Hydrocarbons, BOD and COD
  • Oil degradation reported as improved over the same period
Aboveground steel storage tanks at an industrial facility.
Illustration — aboveground tanks at an industrial site, not the plant described on this page.

01The plant

What was being treated

A petrochemical effluent works carrying part of its organic load on powdered activated carbon.

02Before

How the material got there

Every increase in the incoming organic load meant more carbon dosed, and carbon is a cost twice over — bought, and then disposed of in the sludge it leaves behind. The question put was whether the resident microbial community could be improved enough to carry that load biologically instead.

03Treatment

What was applied, and how

A blend selected for hydrocarbon degradation added to the system, with the carbon dose then reduced in steps as hydrocarbon removal improved, rather than cut at once.

Every result in this library was measured at an operating plant treating with one of the formulations SediLogic supplies, over the window stated above. It is a field result published as reported, not a controlled trial we ran.

04Outcome

What followed

The annual saving is itemised as $102,900 on carbon and $17,700 on the sludge disposal that carbon generates.

At the start

Powdered activated carbon dosed to hold effluent quality, with the dose rising as the load rose.

At the close

Carbon use down 54 per cent with effluent quality held, effluent suspended solids down 26 per cent, and effluent BOD below the permitted figure.

05Limits

What this record does not establish.

The saving is arithmetic on a reduced purchase rather than a measured outcome, and how the 54 per cent was arrived at is not shown — no carbon dose is published at either end. No treatment window is given beyond the annual figure, and nothing is recorded about what the influent did across it. Nothing was left untreated and the works is not named. Reducing a chemical you were buying is a real result; it is not the same thing as a reduction in the material itself.

Only the volatile organic fraction of a sludge responds to any of this. Grit, sand, silt, mineral precipitates and plastics remain at any dose, here and everywhere else.

What we would supply

For this duty, in our range.

Liquid is intended for industrial systems with metered or poured dosing. If the target is settled sludge in a holding basin, discuss a sinking solid and the appropriate application method.

Our written dose tables cover wastewater lagoons. Industrial streams vary considerably, so other applications need a separate review and dose instructions for the specific use.

Read next

The same duty, measured somewhere else.

  • Industrial pre-treatment

    Crude refinery, Central America

    Industrial90 days

    68%

    reduction in extractable petroleum hydrocarbons

    Field resultConfounded

    Oily sludge holding extractable petroleum hydrocarbons at a concentration that made disposal the only route available.

    • 29,195 ppm to 9,395 ppm over 90 days
    Hydrocarbons
  • Industrial pre-treatment

    Municipal oil and water separator, Boston

    MunicipalNot published

    99.7%

    reduction in total petroleum hydrocarbons

    Field result

    Total petroleum hydrocarbons in a separator at more than two hundred times the discharge limit, with pumping the only route to compliance.

    • 22,940 mg/L to 79 mg/L, against a 100 mg/L limit
    • Annual pumping cost reported down to $1,200
    Hydrocarbons
  • Industrial pre-treatment

    Coking plant effluent treatment

    IndustrialWeeks

    29 to 86%

    ammonia removal

    Field resultConfounded

    A nitrifying population that would not establish itself, leaving ammonia removal at less than a third of what the permit assumed.

    • COD removal reported as improved over the same period

    Nitrifying organisms do not survive drying. No product in SediLogic's dry range addresses an ammonia or total-nitrogen permit, and this record is published as part of the field record rather than as an offer.

    Nitrogen and ammoniaBOD and COD

All field results

Your lagoon next

This was measured somewhere else.

This result came from a different plant. Your sludge composition and operating conditions need their own assessment. Send us your lagoon details for a dosing review; do not use the quantity on this page as your application rate.