Skip to content
SediLogic Technologies

Wastewater lagoons

Municipal WWTP, United States

Decades of loading had taken the lagoon to a measured 20.5 per cent solids, with a dredging quotation in hand and no budget line to meet it.

672,659lb

of organic solids digested

Field result
Duty
Wastewater lagoons
Sector
Municipal
Treatment window
3 months
What was counted
Sludge depth and solids
  • Dredging deferred, not ruled out
  • A 4.5x cost saving against the dredging quotation
Aerial view of lagoon cells holding heavily accumulated sludge, the surface dried and cracked.
Illustration — lagoon cells carrying heavy accumulation, not the works described on this page, which names no facility.

01The plant

What was being treated

A municipal lagoon holding about 99 million gallons.

02Before

How the material got there

Decades of loading had brought the accumulation to 20.5 per cent of the lagoon by volume. A dredging quotation was in hand at $2.5 million and there was no budget line to meet it.

03Treatment

What was applied, and how

Hydrated as a powder and applied around the lagoon perimeter over three months, July to October.

Every result in this library was measured at an operating plant treating with one of the formulations SediLogic supplies, over the window stated above. It is a field result published as reported, not a controlled trial we ran.

04Sizing

What the quantity was set against

The opening quantity was set against total volume and the ongoing ones against daily flow, five days a week. Both are bases rather than rates; a quantity for your own lagoon comes from the planner.

05Method

How the result was established

Accumulation depth converted to dry weight at the start and the close.

06Outcome

What followed

The plant reported the work costing a fraction of the quoted dredge. Deferred, not resolved: the inert fraction is still on the bottom, and it will need a dredge eventually.

At the start

20.5 per cent of the lagoon volume taken up by accumulation, against a $2.5 million dredging quotation.

At the close

672,659 dry pounds digested — about 1,682 wet tons — and the dredge not carried out.

07Limits

What this record does not establish.

The closing accumulation is not published as a percentage or a depth, so the reduction cannot be checked against the opening 20.5 per cent. Nothing was left untreated. The lagoon is not named and no location is given, so the result cannot be traced to a works. Neither the volatile fraction at the start nor the method used to convert depth to dry weight is recorded.

Only the volatile organic fraction of a sludge responds to any of this. Grit, sand, silt, mineral precipitates and plastics remain at any dose, here and everywhere else.

What we would supply

For this duty, in our range.

Spike and Puck are sinking solids for bottom sludge. Maintain is a soluble pouch for organic load in the water column, with Polar for cold-water conditions. The planner calculates quantities only for products with a written dose method; Puck and Polar need a separate review.

Use the written dose method for your product and lagoon. A quantity reported in a case study was chosen for that site and should not be used as your application rate.

Read next

The same duty, measured somewhere else.

  • Wastewater lagoons

    Barbourville, Kentucky

    Municipal24 weeks

    43.3%

    of accumulated solids digested

    Field result

    Just over five feet of accumulated solids in the primary aerated lagoon, assessed at 2,365 dry tons. The plant wanted a route that did not involve dredging.

    • 1,025 dry tons removed
    • Average depth 5.08 ft to 2.65 ft
    Sludge depth and solids
  • Wastewater lagoons

    Inkom, Idaho

    MunicipalFive months, May to October

    48%

    reduction in solids volume overall

    Field result

    Accumulated solids across two lagoon cells, against a specification calling for a 50 per cent reduction. The treatment window was bounded by water temperature, which has to stay above roughly 55°F for the organisms to work at all.

    • Cell 1: 75.2 per cent
    • Cell 2: 37.5 per cent
    Sludge depth and solids
  • Wastewater lagoons

    Meat processing facility

    Industrial12 months

    50%

    reduction in accumulated solids

    Field result

    Accumulated solids had cut hydraulic retention time to 13 days, capping what the facility could put through the plant and putting effluent quality within sight of a limit.

    • Retention time 13 days to 25 days
    • Treatment capacity recovered without dredging
    Sludge depth and solidsCapacity and retention time

All field results

Your lagoon next

This was measured somewhere else.

This result came from a different plant. Your sludge composition and operating conditions need their own assessment. Send us your lagoon details for a dosing review; do not use the quantity on this page as your application rate.