Skip to content
SediLogic Technologies

Anaerobic digesters

Potato processing digester

A digester returning less gas than the organic load going into it suggested it should.

86%

increase in biogas yield

Field result
Duty
Anaerobic digesters
Sector
Industrial
Treatment window
90 days
What was counted
Biogas yield
  • Biogas yield per kg of COD removed up 112 per cent
  • COD removal across the anaerobic unit 38 to 53 per cent
Anaerobic digester vessels at a wastewater treatment facility.
Illustration — anaerobic digester vessels, not the digester described on this page.

01The plant

What was being treated

The anaerobic internal-circulation reactor of a plant making French fries and potato flake, treating 2,800 m³ a day (0.74 MGD) of starchy wastewater at about 4,000 mg/L chemical oxygen demand. The gas it makes fuels the site's boilers.

02Before

How the material got there

The reactor worked. The operators simply believed more of the organic load going into it should be leaving as gas than was — every cubic metre not converted is boiler fuel bought instead of made, and load passed downstream to the aerobic stage to be dealt with there at the cost of aeration power.

03Treatment

What was applied, and how

A blend of anaerobic organisms and enzymes added to the anaerobic unit and run for ninety days.

Every result in this library was measured at an operating plant treating with one of the formulations SediLogic supplies, over the window stated above. It is a field result published as reported, not a controlled trial we ran.

04Method

How the result was established

Biogas production, biogas yield per kilogram of COD removed, and COD removal across the anaerobic unit — the same reactor measured with the addition and without it.

05Outcome

What followed

More of the load converted anaerobically meant less of it arriving at the aerobic stage, so aeration demand fell as the gas rose. Floating grease in the anaerobic unit reduced alongside.

At the start

2,389 m³ of biogas a day, a yield of 0.34 m³ per kg of COD removed, and 38 per cent COD removal across the unit.

At the close

4,435 m³ a day, a yield of 0.72 m³ per kg of COD removed, and 53 per cent COD removal.

06Limits

What this record does not establish.

The comparison is one reactor before and after, not two reactors side by side, and a food factory's wastewater strength moves with its production schedule — nothing here holds the feed constant or reports what it did across the window. No plant is named. Digesters are not a duty SediLogic sizes; this is published because it belongs to the field record for these organisms, not because there is an offer behind it.

Only the volatile organic fraction of a sludge responds to any of this. Grit, sand, silt, mineral precipitates and plastics remain at any dose, here and everywhere else.

What we would supply

For this duty, we have nothing.

We do not supply a product specified for anaerobic digesters. Our current dry and liquid blends are intended for lagoons, collection systems and flowing pre-treatment.

This record describes published research on digester biology. We do not supply a product for this application.

Read next

The same duty, measured somewhere else.

  • Anaerobic digesters

    Slaughterhouse digester

    Industrial1 month

    29%

    more biogas

    Field result

    High-strength waste going into a digester that was converting less of it to gas than the plant's generating set could use.

    • 51 per cent higher power generation
    Biogas yield
  • Wastewater lagoons

    Barbourville, Kentucky

    Municipal24 weeks

    43.3%

    of accumulated solids digested

    Field result

    Just over five feet of accumulated solids in the primary aerated lagoon, assessed at 2,365 dry tons. The plant wanted a route that did not involve dredging.

    • 1,025 dry tons removed
    • Average depth 5.08 ft to 2.65 ft
    Sludge depth and solids
  • Wastewater lagoons

    Inkom, Idaho

    MunicipalFive months, May to October

    48%

    reduction in solids volume overall

    Field result

    Accumulated solids across two lagoon cells, against a specification calling for a 50 per cent reduction. The treatment window was bounded by water temperature, which has to stay above roughly 55°F for the organisms to work at all.

    • Cell 1: 75.2 per cent
    • Cell 2: 37.5 per cent
    Sludge depth and solids

All field results

Your lagoon next

This was measured somewhere else.

This result came from a different plant. Your sludge composition and operating conditions need their own assessment. Send us your lagoon details for a dosing review; do not use the quantity on this page as your application rate.