Skip to content
SediLogic Technologies

Aeration basins

Activated sludge plant

Effluent ammonia above what the plant's permit allowed.

97.5%

reduction in effluent ammonia

Field resultConfounded
Duty
Aeration basins
Sector
Industrial
Treatment window
Ten days of seeding
What was counted
Nitrogen and ammonia
  • Effluent ammonium 397 ppm to 10 ppm
  • Basin pH raised over the same ten days
Aeration basin with surface turbulence from diffused air.
Illustration — an aeration basin under diffused air, not the plant described on this page.

01The plant

What was being treated

A chemical works' own activated-sludge plant, 7,600 m³ a day (2.0 MGD), designed for nitrogen removal, with anoxic nitrate removal in a basin fed by return sludge and part of the mixed liquor. Influent ammonium runs 200–800 ppm.

02Before

How the material got there

A plant upset took the nitrifying population out. Effluent ammonium went past 400 ppm and the works was in acute breach of its discharge permit. Basin pH had fallen to 6.1–6.5 — not what caused the loss, but low enough to obstruct a recovery, because nitrification consumes alkalinity as it re-establishes and a restart at that pH could have driven it under 6.0 and stalled there.

03Treatment

What was applied, and how

Nitrifying cultures seeded into the aeration basin across ten days, with caustic soda dosed over the same period to lift pH and alkalinity into a range that would let the population hold.

Every result in this library was measured at an operating plant treating with one of the formulations SediLogic supplies, over the window stated above. It is a field result published as reported, not a controlled trial we ran.

04Sizing

What the quantity was set against

A ten-day seeding rather than a single charge, against the basin — and paired with an alkalinity correction, because seeding into water that cannot hold its own pH wastes the seed.

05Method

How the result was established

Effluent ammonium and effluent nitrate tracked through the ten days, against the works' own operating record from before the upset.

06Outcome

What followed

The mixed liquor was allowed back down to the 6.5–7.0 that had always supported nitrification there, so the caustic dosing did not have to continue.

At the start

Effluent ammonium 397 ppm, mixed liquor pH 6.1–6.5, works in breach of permit.

At the close

Effluent ammonium 10 ppm, a 97.5 per cent reduction. Effluent nitrate rose from zero to a peak of 135 ppm and then eased to 101 as denitrification caught up with it.

07Limits

What this record does not establish.

Two things changed at once and the record is open about it: cultures were seeded and pH was raised across the same ten days, and pH alone can restart a nitrification that has been inhibited rather than lost. That the low pH was not the cause of the loss is the plant's assessment rather than a measurement. Nothing was left untreated and the works is not named.

Only the volatile organic fraction of a sludge responds to any of this. Grit, sand, silt, mineral precipitates and plastics remain at any dose, here and everywhere else.

Nitrifying organisms do not survive drying. No product in SediLogic's dry range addresses an ammonia or total-nitrogen permit, and this record is published as part of the field record rather than as an offer.

What we would supply

For this duty, in our range.

SediLogic Liquid is the article in the range that reaches this — a concentrate for systems that take a metered or poured dose rather than a solid one, which is what a basin under continuous flow is. Nothing in the dry range is the right vehicle for mixed liquor: a sinking solid is built to leave the water column, and mixed liquor is the water column.

SediLogic holds a written dose table for wastewater lagoons and for no other duty, so the planner will not size a basin. A quantity for one is settled with a person against your flow and your loading.

Read next

The same duty, measured somewhere else.

  • Aeration basins

    Containerboard mill, two 14 MG aeration lagoons and a 3 MG polishing lagoon

    IndustrialOne month from a January application

    60%

    lower effluent BOD within a month of dosing

    Field result

    A million gallons a day of mill effluent, and a BOD figure that climbed every winter as the water cooled and biological activity fell away with it.

    • Applied in January, at the coldest point of the year
    BOD and COD
  • Aeration basins

    Dairy processing plant, 1.9 MGD

    IndustrialImprovement inside 4 months

    $40,000

    reported annual saving once settling recovered

    Field resultNo method stated

    Nine months of filamentous growth had taken the settled-volume test above 980 ml/L, so the clarifier could not hold solids and the plant was paying to haul them away.

    • $110 a day of disposal cost avoided
    • Influent BOD around 500 mg/L on 7,192 m³/day
    • No closing settled-volume figure was recorded
    Settling
  • Aeration basins

    Municipal activated sludge plant, 5 MGD

    Municipal1 year

    20%

    reduction in secondary sludge production

    Field result

    A food-processing load arriving at a municipal works, bringing enough grease with it to drive filamentous growth and cost the plant its settling.

    • Effluent TSS 12–16 ppm to under 5 ppm
    • Polymer use halved
    • 1,500 cubic feet of accumulated grease digested inside two months
    • Sludge cake 25 per cent drier
    Fats, oils and greaseSludge depth and solidsSuspended solidsSettling

All field results

Your lagoon next

This was measured somewhere else.

A different plant, a different loading and a different sludge. What decides your result is how much of your own accumulation is organic and treatable, and whether the dose is sized against the lagoon in front of us rather than read off this page. Tell us the dimensions and we will size it.